<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Drives Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ivarjacobson.com/what-drives-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ivarjacobson.com/what-drives-me/</link>
	<description>The Smart Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Barbieri</title>
		<link>http://blog.ivarjacobson.com/what-drives-me/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Barbieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ivarjacobson.com/?p=313#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Mr Jacobson, good evening,
I have been working with use cases for long long time, as well as with BI(Business Intelligence). Now i am thinking about a way to connect both!  BI-UC(BI Use Case). I know that the first is &quot; data driven&quot; and UC is &quot;process driven&quot;  and, in my opinion, there could be &quot;back-end use cases&quot;  and front-end use cases.The first would take care of ETC functions and second of BI-applications.  Do you think those concepts are like oil and water? I don´t.  Thanks Carlos Barbieri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Jacobson, good evening,<br />
I have been working with use cases for long long time, as well as with BI(Business Intelligence). Now i am thinking about a way to connect both!  BI-UC(BI Use Case). I know that the first is &#8221; data driven&#8221; and UC is &#8220;process driven&#8221;  and, in my opinion, there could be &#8220;back-end use cases&#8221;  and front-end use cases.The first would take care of ETC functions and second of BI-applications.  Do you think those concepts are like oil and water? I don´t.  Thanks Carlos Barbieri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe Back</title>
		<link>http://blog.ivarjacobson.com/what-drives-me/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ivarjacobson.com/?p=313#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Words of wisdom. Maybe because they resonate so much with my own ways (albeit not at your scale)!

Key takeovers:

1) find the problem and half of the work is done
2) an idea = a problem + a solution
3) show how to implement an idea otherwise, there is no point
4) my business is there to drive ideas into products (or leverage combinations of existing ones, so I would rather say &quot;into solutions&quot;)
5) practices = allow many methods in a company but still have (essential) governance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words of wisdom. Maybe because they resonate so much with my own ways (albeit not at your scale)!</p>
<p>Key takeovers:</p>
<p>1) find the problem and half of the work is done<br />
2) an idea = a problem + a solution<br />
3) show how to implement an idea otherwise, there is no point<br />
4) my business is there to drive ideas into products (or leverage combinations of existing ones, so I would rather say &#8220;into solutions&#8221;)<br />
5) practices = allow many methods in a company but still have (essential) governance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

